Dottore
Gianni is retired, for nearly a year already. He who used to be so very busy
has not all that much to do these days, which suits him to a point, but he
knows that in order to thrive – live long and prosper – in a vita that is clearly troppo breve he must uncover activities,
interests, even that vile word “hobbies” that he enjoys and then carry them
out. How
lovely then, that yesterday proved a fine day for two of what have become the good
doctor’s favorite activities. It was (and remains today) unseasonably warm for
January so he took one of his near daily healthwalks, five miles along the
swamp rabbit trail. He sweated more, it seemed to him, more than any three
others that he encountered along the trail, but returned home refreshed and
invigorated.
Walks
of course one can embark upon nearly any day, and Dottore Gianni takes full
advantage of the opportunities, despite having pushed himself too far a few
months ago when he injured his left foot, a case of plantar fasciitis.
Buds appear in mid-January - A fine day for a walk! |
He
never believed he could become afflicted with such a condition, as he has no
fascistic tendencies, except, it would appear, in his left foot, but there you
have it! This aggravating condition limited his walks and forced him to
exercise his afflicted foot daily, but particularly with the help of a footbath
given him by his sister and a “boot” which holds the foot in a favorable
position to treat the the fasces (fascists?) in his footie given him by his
sister-in-law, he has been recovering rapidly, and in the last week has walked
nearly every day, at least four, more often five miles a day.
The
good doctor needs this exercise dearly, as the relative inactivity of recent
times has caused him to gain weight. The goal is that when he looks down he is
able to see his belt buckle. He’s not there yet, but he’s determined and where
there’s a will (so they say) there’s a way.
The
second activity, concerts of classical music, are entertainments, recreations,
more importantly artistic endeavors that the good doctor has been interested in
for ages but has been unable to act upon as frequently as he’d have liked
because of location and/or deprivation (of funds to pay for such outings).
Until the 2012-13 season offered by the Greenville Symphony Orchestra (GSO)!
This joyous experience discussed in several recent blog posts by Dottore Gianni
has been placed on hold for nearly as long as his walks, because of an accident
not of the foot but of another kind entirely, at least in Greenville SC in
December. The doctor has observe a dearth of any concerts except for those of
the Christmas kind. No objection on the doctor’s part to a glorious rendition
of Bach’s Christmas Oratorio, for example, but that is not going to happen in
the upcountry of the Carolinas. Instead one is assaulted by concerts of the
“pops” variety, which…well, for people who like that sort of thing, that is the
sort of thing they like.
But
not Dottore Gianni! Not for him a concert offered by the GSO, for example,
which features a Frank Sinatra impersonator and family style sing-alongs. The
doctor would rather spend a few hours in a dentist’s chair, thank you very
much. And the GSO concert was the best opportunity in December among the many
offerings in the area, most of which were flavored with more than a dash of old
time religion (we are after all living in the “buckle of the bible belt”).
So
since mid-November a recently acquired favorite activity has been unavailable,
alas, alack and (fill in any other appropriate term…”sad to say” etc etc etc).
BUT! All that was rectified yesterday at 2 pm, when he attended the second of
three concerts in the Spotlight Series scheduled for the current season.
At
whom is the “spotlight” pointed? At some of the top musicians in the orchestra.
Every one of the players in yesterday’s concert is the principal player in
their instruments, and several are Endowed Chairs. My readers will know that I
think the GSO is really quite fine, and to hear the finest of the fine in an
intimate setting at Centre Stage, a small thrust theatre space near the Peace
Center, is a real treat.
This
particular concert is titled Dueling Fifths, an enigma to Dottore Gianni (will
there be gunfire? swordplay? fisticuffs at least?) until he realized that the
two pieces on the program are written for quintets, one for woodwinds, the
other for strings. The audience is asked in the very brief program note, copied
in its entirety below:
“Expressivity versus Formality: Who will be
declared the winner? You will, as you’re sure to enjoy both incredible
quintets!”
Expressivity
is represented by Paul Taffanel’s Woodwind Quintet in G Minor, formality by
Anton Dvořák’s String Quintet in G Major, Op. 77. Of course the program note
asks but also hastily answers the question, so there is to be no winner of this
duel…or is there? Dottore Gianni finds it very easy to proclaim a winner, but
will keep his miniscule audience (Is ANYbody there? Does anybody care?) in
suspense while he launches into a bit of biography, as is his wont.
The
good doctor did not know Paul Taffanel (1844-1908) before this concert, and
it’s not surprising as our ever-present if not all-knowing Wikipedia bills him
as “the French flutist, conductor and instructor
three faces of Taffanel: 1 |
regarded as the founder of the
French Flute School that dominated much of flute composition and performance
during the mid-twentieth century.” But not as a composer. In fact he did
compose several pieces for the flute repertoire, including the quintet in 1876,
but his principal merits included building “a substantial career as
both soloist and orchestral player over 30 years, becoming known as the
foremost flautist of his time and reestablishing the instrument in the
mainstream of music.”
three faces of Taffanel: 2 |
Taffanel became the foremost flautist of his generation,
toured extensively, was chief conductor at the Paris Opéra, did much to revive
in France an interest in Bach and other eighteenth century composers, as well
as an excellent teacher. In fact Taffanel began writing a method book for the
flute which his students completed after his death and which is still a
standard method book for players of the flute.
three faces of Taffanel: 3 |
(note: Dottore Gianni is not overly
fond of the word “flautist” and is attempting to not flaunt “flaut” in this
essay.) In the introduction to the piece given by Amy Yang, principal
bassoonist of the GSO, Ms. Yang asked Caroline Ulrich, principal flute player,
if she had studied from it when learning the instrument. Ms. Ulrich not only
assented, but played a bit of the exercises, to the delight of the audience.
Admittedly, the audience that attends GSO concerts is a group that delights
easily.
So
much if not very much for Taffanel. I mean by that that I
found little about his life. Perhaps outside of his gifts with the flute it was
a tad dull? Wikipedia can usually be counted on to recount adventures in its
brief bios. None such here, but perhaps that’s just as well.
Now
to Antonin Dvořák (1841-1904, a favorite of mine!
Dvořák |
Though one of the several
names to which I answer is Dottore Gianni I am not a full-blooded Italian
(except in my dreams). A large part of my background is Slavic, and no Slav in
his right mind can deny the power and beauty of Dvořák’s music. He was born and
bred in a village not far from Prague, where among other things (his father was
a butcher and young Antonin was apprenticed to that trade) he learned to play
the violin, later added piano and organ to his skills. When he moved to Prague
in 1857 he joined an orchestra which played in restaurants and for balls,
frequently utilizing in their repertoire local folk music. The orchestra was
also taken on at the Bohemian Provisional Theatre, so he was busy musically,
but by the early 1860s he also began composing and teaching. One of his pupils,
Josefína Čermáková, caught his eye and stole his heart, but alas the feelings
were not reciprocated by the young woman. Keeping it in the family so to speak,
Dvořák wooed and won Josefina’s younger sister, Anna, whom he married in 1873.
Dvořák and his wife |
After
Dvořák’s marriage he left the orchestra to become organist at St Adelbert’s
Church in Prague, which job allowed him more free time to compose. He did so,
emulating to a point the style of his fellow countryman Bedrich Smetana and
also Johannes Brahms, who took an interest in Dvořák’s music and helped him
gain an international reputation. This repute grew quickly. Dvořák visited
London several times, was commissioned by the Royal Philharmonic Society to
conduct in London, and later moved to the U.S., where he lived and ran the
National Conservatory of Music (1892-95), and where he composed his famous
Symphony No. 9, “From the New World,” and also the String Quartet in F (the
“American”) among other works.
The Narodni Divadlo, or National Theatre, Prague |
The
Czech in me loves the National Theatre, and loves Dvořák and his music even
more, for nationalistic as well as artistic reasons.
And
while I realize I got carried away a bit I do want to bring us back to the
composer’s relatively early influence on what would become perhaps the most
vitally American form: jazz. I was listening this morning to the
excellent Performance Today on public radio. The show’s host played a ballet
from the early 1920s, The Creation of the
World by Milhaud and noted that it was very jazz influenced, and while it
might not be shocking today it certainly was a shock in the 1920s. Clearly,
thanks in part to Dvořák, the new music was growing and becoming incorporated
more subtly into some American music well before the Roaring Twenties.
If you get to Prague visit as I did the Dvořák Museum, called Villa Amerika |
So!
The Dvořáks grew homesick for their own land and in 1895 returned. In his last
years Dvořák continued to compose, concentrating on opera and chamber music. He
died from a stroke in 1904 and his funeral was, as Wikipedia puts it, “an event
of national significance.
But
how about the concert, Dottore Gianni? How about the concert?!?
The
Taffanel piece is divided into three movements, marked
Allegro con Moto
Andante
Vivace
So,
two very bright movements with a slower movement in a more contemplative mode
between them. Given my inexperience I have no way of being sure about this, but
the piece struck me as enjoyably quirky and forward-looking for music written
in 1876. Was it well played? Of course, but I will confess to listening to a
portion of the first movement on YouTube. It was taken at a much faster clip
than the GSO played it, and it seemed with more confidence. For the first time
in my experience with leading players of the GSO, the playing seemed a bit
forced and I felt the performers working at the piece instead of being assured
and enjoying playing it. The important horn solo at the beginning of he second
movement was also being worked at instead of being executed with assurance. All
in all I liked the quintet very much but the pushing I experienced caused me to
like it least of any piece I have heard any ensemble from the GSO play.
A
note before I move forward. Remember that I am writing these blogs not because
I’m expert but to teach myself more about an artistic form I love but of which
I am not all that knowledgeable. Having said that, when I think of winds I
think woodwind, and the horn, a French horn, strikes me as brass and not wind.
There IS a woodwind called the English horn, and I expected that to be the
fifth instrument in the ensemble that otherwise consisted of flute, oboe,
clarinet and bassoon.
So I did a little digging and found that most wind quintets consist of those four and a French horn, and realized that while a French horn is brass and not woodwind, it is still a wind instrument versus a stringed instrument, so that in the sense that it requires wind, in fact a lot of wind, it fits the category well.
An English Horn |
So I did a little digging and found that most wind quintets consist of those four and a French horn, and realized that while a French horn is brass and not woodwind, it is still a wind instrument versus a stringed instrument, so that in the sense that it requires wind, in fact a lot of wind, it fits the category well.
I
also realize as I write that by this time some of you may find Dottore Gianni a
bit LONG-winded, even at times a bit of a BLOW-hard…so I’ll get on with it.
Unlike
the wind piece, the Dvořák quintet seemed in the hands of of masterly
musicians. The concertmaster of the orchestra, Xiaoqing Yu, is a really fine,
fine violinist, and at very least the others in the ensemble seemed to love
keeping up with him. There was a joy in the playing, and a harmonious unity
within the group that this amateur admired exceedingly. The piece was
originally written in five movements, but the composer decided that the second
movement, which was written as andante, was one andante too many for the whole,
so cut it and transformed it into a serenade for strings. What audiences
regularly hear is divided into the following:
Allegro con fuoco (I love fuoco, which means
fire!)
Scherzo: Allegro Vivace
Poco Andante
Vivace
The
quintet is unusual in that instead of adding a second viola to a string
quartet, or in some cases a second cello, Dvořák used as the fifth instrument a
double bass, literally deepening the tone of the piece. Nowhere was I more
swept up in the music than in the beautiful third movement, but I found nothing
to fault in the piece, in fact so caught up was I in the music that I never thought to find fault. I call that fine work!
So,
in my opinion Dvořák won the duel hands down. You already see how prejudiced I
am, admiring the composer and his music as I do. But I’m also a tad prejudiced
towards strings over winds in general. No good orchestra would be complete
without the latter but the soul of the orchestra is in the former. This from an
admitted amateur, admittedly, but I don’t think I could be persuaded otherwise.
Oh!
I should add that Maestro Tchivzhel was a member of the audience that
afternoon, and I was delighted to see him. I found myself thinking,
particularly after the Dvořák, that he must take great pleasure in hearing the
finest of his musicians making beautiful music together in small ensembles. I
also saw my girlfriend (of course she’s not, except in my fantasia) Katie Dey,
the excellent violist, and she whom I described in my very first post on the
GSO as a very dramatic musician, from her main of auburn, tightly curled hair, to the sway in her body as she makes music. I saw her not only on stage, but also as she was leaving the hall directly ahead of
me. In fact she turned for just a moment and we made eye contact. In the words
of the Bard, who gives them to Viola in Twelfth Night:
“she made good view of me…”
and
a few lines later,
“she loves me, sure!”
Of
course she doesn’t, but as I say, in Dottore Gianni’s famous if unwritten
Fantasia in F Maybe, she just might!
Thank you for sharing the concert with us! You worked as hard in its retelling as the musicians did on-stage!! And delighted to hear of your 'girlfriend,' Ms. Dey...I confess that I've called Derek Jeter my boyfriend for over a decade...fortunately my husband is most understanding of my one-sided affair...
ReplyDeleteCarey, thanks for taking time to read another of Jack's self-education in music blogs! It's actually fun to have something to research -- more to come, as I'm seeing Nadia Salerno-Sonnenberg on Tuesday, and have another symphony concert next Sunday -- I'm having fun, but it's great to know that a few at least are reading as well! All best!
ReplyDelete